| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
the night watchman
Studio Exec
Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Posts: 1373
Location: Dark, run-down shack by the graveyard.
|
 Posted: 02.23.2004 2:57 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Danny Baldwin wrote: |
Pulp Fiction (Tarantino, 1994) - 90000789009.75657 |
Oh, come on. It's obvious Pulp Fiction ought to receive a 90000789009.75659 at least.
_________________
"If you're talking about censorship, and what things should be shown and what things shouldn't be shown, I've said that as an artist you have no social responsibility whatsoever."
-David Cronenberg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beltmann
Studio Exec
Joined: 26 Jun 2003
Posts: 2341
Location: West Bend, WI
|
| Posted: 02.23.2004 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Danny Baldwin wrote: | I think he's only got maybe one or two beers in his system. This is how things should be done:
Pulp Fiction (Tarantino, 1994) - 90000789009.75657 |
Now that's just gibberish. Don't be silly.
Eric |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
frostiang
Grip
Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 11
Location: Salem, OR
|
| Posted: 08.25.2004 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I have never seen critics that use this before but I plan on going to this Mike D'Angelo's website. I think the idea is somewhat interesting and want to see it applied. It could be fun if not artistically correct or valid. But I just rate movies on the thumbs up/down scale when I need to. Because all I do is tell people whether or not they should go see movies. They don't listen either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
