|
Flipside Movie Emporium Discussion Forums Locked & Archived for Browsing
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
matt header Studio Exec
Joined: 26 Jun 2003 Posts: 623 Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
Posted: 04.19.2004 2:50 am Post subject: Dogville |
|
|
Recently I saw a screening of Lars von Trier's latest film: Dogville, starring Nicole Kidman. The film doesn't open in Milwaukee until April 30, but I'm fascinated to know what people think about it. Formally it is brilliant: its minimalist style, composed of only one soundstage, few props, and barely any built sets, stresses primitive barbarism, and the lack of walls results in some awesome compositions. (One rape scene is especially disturbing because everyone in the town can obviously see it, although they are ostensibly and figuratively separated by walls.) Indeed, if Mel Gibson hadn't scourged Jesus for two hours earlier this year, Kidman's character of Grace would be the most tortured movie character of the year: every single citizen of Dogville abuses her, rapes her, beats her, or cheats her in some way. And therin lies the greatest fault of Dogville: it is the most viciously anti-American film I've ever seen. I don't even know if you could argue that, since the closing credits consist of a series of photographs of injustice, racism, violence, and shallowness in America since the Great Depression. Von Trier's anti-Americanism would be fine if it was aimed at our government, which presently deserves a great deal of ridicule ( ), or an institution that deserves condemnation, like big-business corporatism or the hypocritical media, etc. But, no: von Trier aims at every individual American citizen. He implies that if you live in the States, you are inherently an ugly creature. He doesn't even pretend that it is a universal story: Dogville represents the United States right from the get-go. His argument is simplistic fundamentally (it didn't really bother me on a patriotic level, although the fact that von Trier's never been to the United States is pretty ludicrous), which is a shame since so much of his style is ingenious. I don't want to call it misanthropic and misogynistic, because too many critics do that when a film addresses the darkness of human nature; but there's no denying the hatred von Trier has, if not for Americans, then at least for people in general (which must be worse).
I'm fascinated in knowing what you folks think of it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
beltmann Studio Exec
Joined: 26 Jun 2003 Posts: 2341 Location: West Bend, WI
|
Posted: 04.19.2004 3:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been faithfully reading about it in the European press for many months now, and I can't wait to check it out for myself. (If you had asked in December, I would have said Dogville was my biggest must-see for 2004.) Right now, all I have to say is that I usually find Von Trier simultaneously fascinating and maddening, and that I hate you for getting to see all those advance screenings.
Eric _________________ "When I was in Barcelona they showed pornography on regular television. I'm assuming it's the same way in Mexico since they also speak Spanish." - IMDb user comment |
|
Back to top |
|
|
matt header Studio Exec
Joined: 26 Jun 2003 Posts: 623 Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
Posted: 04.19.2004 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I hate you for getting to see all those advance screenings.
|
Ha ha ha! I'm on all the VIP lists here in Milwaukee. Yeah, you know. No big deal. Well, excuse me for a moment, I have to go polish the hubcaps of my limousine.
And now I'm sad, because that is quite the opposite of true. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
janie Grip
Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Posts: 1 Location: Santa Fe
|
Posted: 08.01.2005 5:42 pm Post subject: dogville |
|
|
Ok so one could say that treatment ofNicloe K. represents our forgein policy but then what else is here? She represents 'others' that are not 'fear-based', accepting and more open. I came in on the movie after it started and didn't get the poverty/class struggle issue...fill me in please- I was disturbed and loved it's style, craving for more meaning to get inside my brain. And in the end- power corrupts or Jesus gone Judas or we are gonna get nuked for our greed and sort sightedness?? Help me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
matt header Studio Exec
Joined: 26 Jun 2003 Posts: 623 Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
Posted: 08.02.2005 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So I've seen this again since my initial post and like it quite a bit more, with reservations. The end I take as a general statement on the nature of retribution: violence begets violence. Grace, who had been the film's martyr for so long, now is equally condemned by performing an action -- vengeance -- so animalistic and so often used as justification for violence. I would say that it could be von Trier's fantasy (to get back at us dirty Americans) disguised as a statement on violence, but I don't think that's accurate; he obviously condemns Grace's actions, which disturbingly subverts the atrocities committed against her in the film. _________________ "I don't like talking to people I know, but strangers I have no problem with." -- Larry David, "Curb Your Enthusiasm" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001-2007 phpBB Group
|